In heavy-duty machining, accuracy and economy are essential. One tool that greatly improves both is the power chuck. This article will discuss the top seven advantages of using power chucks in heavy-duty machining and why they are essential for every professional machinist.
Link to DRAKE
1. Improved Gribing Power
Compared to hand chucks, a power chuck has outstanding gripping strength. This function guarantees that, under tremendous pressure, your workpiece remains firmly in place. More precise cuts and a safer working environment follow from a tight grip, reducing the possibility of slippage.
2. Greater Machining Speed
In heavy-duty machining, specifically, time is money. Faster clamping and unclamping made possible by power chucks lets you finish operations more rapidly. The automated system also minimizes downtime between activities, therefore optimizing output and enabling the meeting of strict deadlines.
3. Constant Accuracy
Quality machining’s foundation is precision. Because power chucks provide uniform clamping force, every workpiece is held with the same degree of precision. This uniformity reduces mistakes, hence producing excellent finishes and less demand for rework.
4.Flexibility in handling workpieces
In heavy-duty machining, forms and materials abound. Power chucks are adaptable and easily handle multiple workpieces. A power chuck may change to fit your demands without sacrificing performance, whether you are handling big, tiny, or irregularly shaped things.
Want more information on CNC Power Chuck? Feel free to contact us.
5. Enhanced Safety
Machining should always be a safety-first concern. A power chuck’s strong grip helps to lower the possibility of workpiece dislodging during operation. The automatic clamping system also reduces manual intervention, therefore reducing the possibility of mishaps.
6. Lowering Operator Weariness
Particularly in extended machining runs, manual clamping may be physically taxing. Power chucks save operator fatigue by removing the need for continual hand corrections. This not only increases efficiency but also reduces operator strain, therefore promoting a better working environment.
7. Durability and lifespan
Purchasing a power chuck requires long-term thinking. Designed to resist the demands of heavy-duty machining, these instruments provide longevity, guaranteeing years of use. Less maintenance and less expense over time follow from the strong construction of power chucks.
Result
In heavy-duty machining, the correct tools make all the difference. While boosting safety and lowering operator tiredness, a power chuck provides constant accuracy, more speed, and better gripping strength. For everyone who takes machining seriously, its adaptability and durability are indispensable. Including power chucks in your processes can help you create better results and more productivity.
For more information, please visit Drake Machine Tool.
Thats about what you get.
If you use a boring ring while boring the jaws you MIGHT get a little closer, but don't count on it after you have changed top jaws. If you need better, you will still need to indicate every part by hand. I don't think a new 4k chuck will help. Add to that, you are using soft materials to hold your work, now you have issues with chips #ucking up the nice bore job you did.
Since it is a used lathe you have no idea the amount of cycles that the chuck has , or how often it was greased for that matter. We have a couple of Mazaks that we have had new since with B208 chucks on them and they can be counted on reliably to run within . TIR or less. How do the T nuts look? They can get mushroomed out over time and cause runout problems, but usually on parallelism. If your are using some type of jaw backlash devise(boring rings, spider,or such) to bore your jaws i would be surprised if your TIR didn't improve. Its a pain in the butt but you might want to remove the chuck and see what kind of wear there is wheree the master jaws slide in the chuck body. It is possible that it just worn out or has a master jaw thats cracked.
Thanks for the helpful replies. I spoke to someone at Kitagawa and they confirmed that a new chuck may only improve things by ."
Sounds like there are other variables to check. As Kevin66 mentioned, mushroomed T nuts is one of them. Kitagawa swears by their Chuck-eez grease, claiming it can dramatically improve repeatability. They also claim that their factory top jaws make a difference. So, I have all new of the above shipping today. We also took the chuck off today, disassembled and checked it over. Master jaws and slots appear very good. We'll see how it goes with the new components and magic grease. It better be good at $385/case!
Thats about what you get.
If you use a boring ring while boring the jaws you MIGHT get a little closer, but don't count on it after you have changed top jaws. If you need better, you will still need to indicate every part by hand. I don't think a new 4k chuck will help. Add to that, you are using soft materials to hold your work, now you have issues with chips #ucking up the nice bore job you did.
A new 4k chuck can definitely help, just not if you go and buy another Kitigawa or similar.
I have a few Kitigawas in the shop that were bought new. There are far better chucks out there. I have a Berg that is pushing 30 years old with who knows how many cycles on it. With carefully bored soft jaws and good uniform parts it can repeat to 5 microns between parts no problem. The master jaws in the Kits have way too much clearance to hold that kind of repeatability.
The Berg chuck is so good they haven't changed the design - or even the part number - since. I'd expect others like Schunk and Autoblok to be considerably better than the common chucks as well.
Interestingly I have a Doosan with Samschully chucks that AFAIK are made under license from Kitigawa, but they seem to be a tighter fit between the master jaws and the body than the Kits.
A new 4k chuck can definitely help, just not if you go and buy another Kitigawa or similar.
I have a few Kitigawas in the shop that were bought new. There are far better chucks out there. I have a Berg that is pushing 30 years old with who knows how many cycles on it. With carefully bored soft jaws and good uniform parts it can repeat to 5 microns between parts no problem. The master jaws in the Kits have way too much clearance to hold that kind of repeatability.
The Berg chuck is so good they haven't changed the design - or even the part number - since. I'd expect others like Schunk and Autoblok to be considerably better than the common chucks as well.
Interestingly I have a Doosan with Samschully chucks that AFAIK are made under license from Kitigawa, but they seem to be a tighter fit between the master jaws and the body than the Kits.
And approximately how much would a Berg chuck cost?
The best we can get is about . - ."
How normal is this?
This is pretty normal. 0. is a bit on the high side, but the chuck is used. Normally I'd say 0.-0. is the best you'd expect on a new chuck - you'd get 0. most of the time, but completely avoiding outliers around 0." without indicating 100% of the parts would be unlikely.
There are "application chucks" out there that are much more accurate than a typical 3-jaw. The basic idea is somewhat similar to the comparison of a 16-degree ER collet vs an 8-degree slow-taper (SK) collet - you get less clamping range and application flexibility with the latter, but greater accuracy.
You may have seen the Northfield advertisements in MMS magazines (High Precision Diaphragm Chucks & Precision Air Chucks: Northfield). They make diaphragm chucks with guaranteed precision of 0. radial TIR and 0. axial TIR.
success
Here's an update on my Kitagawa B-210 efforts...
As mentioned, I got new Tnuts, Kitagawa top jaws, and Chuck-Eez grease. We took apart our chuck and cleaned out all the old grease, used a stone lightly on the flat surfaces between the back plate and the chuck, carefully greased and torqued everything down evenly. Then we pumped more grease and opened and closed the chuck many times. Then we carefully bored with a nice carbide boring bar using about a 2" ring.
End result: we now have repeatable consistent ." TIR. Before it was jumping anywhere from ." - .003"
So, this is a big improvement and probably means we will keep this chuck for now. I was very close to going with an Autoblok and had looked into the Berg and was checking out the other resources and links mentioned above, which are all very helpful.
Thanks to all for the input.