Commercial chillers are designed to cool large areas in various applications. Energy-efficient chillers use advanced technology to minimize the amount of electricity they need to operate, helping reduce energy costs and their impact on the environment. As a business owner or engineer, you want to reduce your operational costs and greenhouse gas emissions. However, you may be worried about selecting a commercial chiller that may not adequately meet the cooling demands of your facility or one that may end up being inefficient in the long run.
You can find more information on our web, so please take a look.
Most efficient refrigeration systems have expanded in new directions in most industries, including medical, food processing and manufacturing. Our energy-efficient chiller guide will help you choose the most suitable chiller for your needs. You will learn what makes them efficient and which factors to consider. This information can help you confidently choose the right commercial chiller system that will balance upfront costs with long-term savings.
Heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, including chillers, consume more than 40% of a building’s energy. Replacing old models with efficient chillers can give you a competitive advantage by reducing production costs and utility bills.
To keep a commercial chiller sustainable in the long run, use the following tips to maximize its efficiency.
Generally, you can use one of two formulas to calculate chiller efficiency. The first measure of the cooling efficiency of a chiller is the coefficient of performance (COP). The second chiller efficiency calculation uses the energy efficiency ratio (EER). The higher the COP or EER number, the better the chiller efficiency per unit of electricity consumed.
While COP and EER are both good metrics, they differ in how they are calculated and what they represent:
Let’s say a chiller produces 5,000 kW of cooling while consuming 500 kW of electricity. Its COP would be:
In this case, the chiller produces 10 kW of cooling for every 1 kW of consumed electricity.
Finding the chiller efficiency as EER follows the same calculation. You can convert the chiller’s Btu to kW by multiplying it by 0. before using the COP formula. For example, if a chiller’s cooling capacity is 150 Btu, you’ll calculate its chiller efficiency as follows:
A 150 Btu chiller produces almost 22 kW of cooling for every 1 kW of consumed electricity.
A third way to measure efficiency is to check the approach temperature of a chiller. Approach temperature is the difference between the temperature of chilled water leaving the chiller and the temperature of the refrigerant inside the chiller. It indicates how effectively a chiller is transferring heat and cooling the water. The formula for chiller approach temperature is:
A low approach temperature indicates that a chiller is working at a high efficiency. In contrast, a high approach temperature is a common sign of an inefficient chiller. The higher the approach temperature, the harder the compressor needs to work in the cooling process, using more energy.
Optimizing often starts with the basic components of any equipment. Consider the following features when searching for or customizing an energy-efficient chiller for your organization:
You’ll want to consider a few factors when buying an industrial chiller. When it comes to energy efficiency, in particular, you must look at additional needs, especially when you work in specialized industries. Consider these factors when evaluating different chillers:
Energy-efficient commercial chillers need regular maintenance and servicing like any other equipment to keep them running optimally. Operating them without regular checks can lead to significant challenges, including higher energy consumption rates, inadequate cooling and system breakdown. Fortunately, you can take specific measures to improve a chiller’s operation:
The type of chiller you need for your facility depends on your products, the size of your facility and your output. While most new models are designed to work more efficiently, the following examples will give you the best energy output results.
We listed some common queries about efficient chillers and energy efficiency formulas if you’re looking for short answers to frequently asked questions.
linggong supply professional and honest service.
You can calculate the energy efficiency of a chiller by using the COP or EER formula. Both measure the cooling output’s ratio to a chiller’s energy input. However, COP indicates how effectively the chiller converts energy into cooling, while EER gives a snapshot of the chiller’s efficiency at one point. The energy efficiency of COP and EER have similar calculations, but because EER is measured in Btu, you need to convert the input to kW before it can be calculated.
Another way to ensure a chiller is still working efficiently is to measure its approach temperature, which is the difference between the condensing refrigerant and water supply temperatures. A low approach temperature indicates the chiller is working well, while a high COP or EER number indicates a highly energy-efficient chiller.
The best chiller efficiency range depends on the type of chiller, its weight, the operating conditions and whether it is partially or fully loaded. Lower kW/ton values represent higher efficiency. Air-cooled chillers’ efficiency can range between 0.8 kW/ton and 1.2 kW/ton, and water-cooled chillers from about 0.45 kW/ton to 0.64 kW/ton.
There’s room for improvement in efficiency the moment air-cooled chillers reach above 1.2 kW/ton and water-cooled chillers above 0.64 kW/ton.
Generally, water-cooled chillers are more energy-efficient than air-cooled chillers. They tend to be more compact, have longer operating lives and produce less noise. However, every industry and type of facility has different needs, and the most efficient chiller for one may be inadequate for another application. When choosing the best one for your work output, consider a chiller’s life cycle and operating costs.
Some chillers have components that help compress refrigerants with fewer moving parts and built-in VFDs for a higher cooling output per energy unit. Other types tend to last longer or operate on systems that keep temperatures consistent in industries where temperature plays a major role. It’s best to speak to a professional to determine which type would be the most efficient for your facility.
When selecting commercial chillers, it’s important to prioritize energy efficiency. Smart Family of Cooling Products specializes in manufacturing different types of chillers, including air-cooled, water-cooled and low-temperature chillers. We also build industrial custom refrigeration products with your specifications and processes in mind. Our unique expertise allows us to provide experienced consultation if you need help choosing the most energy-efficient and cost-effective chillers.
For more info on our chillers, contact our team online, and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
Annual Energy Use: Assumed 2,000 operating hours per year, for 23 years.
Annual Energy Cost: Calculated based on an assumed electricity price of 8.6¢/kWh, which is the average electricity price at federal facilities in the United States.
Lifetime Energy Cost: Future electricity price trends and a 3% discount rate are from the Annual Supplement to NIST Handbook 135 and NBS Special Publication 709, Energy Price Indices and Discount Factors for Life Cycle Cost Analysis – (NISTIR 85--37 update 1).
Lifetime Energy Cost Savings: The difference between the lifetime energy cost of the less efficient model and the lifetime energy cost of the required model or best available model.
Calculated based on the highest efficiency model identified in publicly provided manufacturer data as of June . Note that more efficient models may be introduced to the market after FEMP's acquisition guidance is posted.
Calculated based on FEMP-designated efficiency requirements. Federal agencies must purchase products that meet or exceed FEMP-designated efficiency levels.
Calculated based on median efficiency of models identified in publicly provided manufacturer data as of June .
Products meeting FEMP-designated efficiency requirements may not be life cycle cost-effective in certain low-use applications or in locations with very low rates for electricity or natural gas. However, for most applications, purchasers will find that energy-efficient products have the lowest life cycle cost.
Agencies may claim an exception to federal purchasing requirements through a written finding that no ENERGY STAR-qualified or FEMP-designated product is available to meet functional requirements, or that no such product is life cycle cost-effective for the specific application. Get additional information on federal product purchasing requirements.
For more Air Cooled Integrated Refrigeration Chillersinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.